Comment and Link Roundup: August 27, 2021
Aug. 27th, 2021 09:50 pmComments on my own posts:
[fairly mild cw: food] Comment and Link Roundup: August 9th, 2021
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: apocalypse, scrupulosity] [My Own Advisor; Wayback] (OP by Mark Seed) A gentle correction of one of the most important omissions I encountered on my wiki-walk through Canadian personal-finance blogs, climate-crisis individual-action edition.
[arguably cw: bugs] [Mastodon; Wayback] (OP by monsterblue@dragon.style) Today in spreading the good word of PPE: wearable mosquito nets.
[arguably cw: apocalypse] [WordPress (Tumblr)] (OP by
tarhalindur) Laptop recommendations for an erratic-supply-chain world.
[cw: food] [WordPress (Tumblr)] (OP by
rustingbridges) Peaches, the easy way(s).
---
Links:
[strong cw: war, murder] [Data Secrets Lox part 1; Data Secrets Lox part 2; Wayback part 1; Wayback part 2] (by Chevalier Mal Fet) I don't read Data Secrets Lox much, but every once in a while I take a look at what's won the Alexander Prize for Effortposting. Turns out in May and June one of the people there wrote a whole-ass history book on 20th-century South Korea, with a focus on the Gwangju Uprising of 1980. Well-written, and a good look into a time period from after most history lessons stop.
(Note: I did not proofread a whole book, but the bits I double-checked seemed accurate.)
[Patagonia; Wayback] (by Sakeus Bankson) Zippers: the bane of high-quality, low-waste clothing manufacturers.
Laugh rule:
[arguably cw: unreality] [gwern.net; Wayback]
[cw: unreality] [Wikipedia; Wayback] Not a laugh-rule link, but it needed to be after that one: while we're talking about H. Petard, take a look at Ong's Hat.
There is a blanket [cw: illness] on the rest of this post.
( Read more... )
[fairly mild cw: food] Comment and Link Roundup: August 9th, 2021
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: apocalypse, scrupulosity] [My Own Advisor; Wayback] (OP by Mark Seed) A gentle correction of one of the most important omissions I encountered on my wiki-walk through Canadian personal-finance blogs, climate-crisis individual-action edition.
[arguably cw: bugs] [Mastodon; Wayback] (OP by monsterblue@dragon.style) Today in spreading the good word of PPE: wearable mosquito nets.
[arguably cw: apocalypse] [WordPress (Tumblr)] (OP by
[cw: food] [WordPress (Tumblr)] (OP by
---
Links:
[strong cw: war, murder] [Data Secrets Lox part 1; Data Secrets Lox part 2; Wayback part 1; Wayback part 2] (by Chevalier Mal Fet) I don't read Data Secrets Lox much, but every once in a while I take a look at what's won the Alexander Prize for Effortposting. Turns out in May and June one of the people there wrote a whole-ass history book on 20th-century South Korea, with a focus on the Gwangju Uprising of 1980. Well-written, and a good look into a time period from after most history lessons stop.
(Note: I did not proofread a whole book, but the bits I double-checked seemed accurate.)
[Patagonia; Wayback] (by Sakeus Bankson) Zippers: the bane of high-quality, low-waste clothing manufacturers.
Laugh rule:
[arguably cw: unreality] [gwern.net; Wayback]
The lion-hunting paper was duly accepted for publication, with one editorial alteration: our footnote to a footnote was ruthlessly removed.4
4Monsters! —Editor. ↩
[cw: unreality] [Wikipedia; Wayback] Not a laugh-rule link, but it needed to be after that one: while we're talking about H. Petard, take a look at Ong's Hat.
There is a blanket [cw: illness] on the rest of this post.
( Read more... )
Comments on my own posts:
[cw: what it says on the tin (no pictures)] Recipe: Chocolate Nut Torte
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: venting] [Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
yvannairie) Understaffing bullshit.
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
sigmaleph) What to do when a public holiday falls on a Sunday.
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
little-brisk) Various ways to back up a Tumblr.
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
sigmaleph) Mathematical (and other) mnemonics.
[cw: amnesia, arguably unreality] (Note: the Tumblr reverse-post-order glitch continues.) [Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
reasonsmysoniscrying; in response to
maryellencarter) Minor precognition, or so your brain insists.
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
sigmaleph) Stratford-based news broadcasters won't tell you what Justin Bieber is famous *for*, but by God is he from Stratford.
(I've decided that tag rambles are a substantial enough contribution to be worth including.) [Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
minatokun) "Accounting majors, who hurt you?"
(Note: I do not actually *endorse* the claim that people imposing [selection pressure for accounting talent] on my *ancestors* are harming *me* (though I can see why someone might argue it, and certainly it was harming *them*). Personally I've been rather enjoying having won accounting in the lottery of fascinations, *especially* because it is--by the standards of the general population--a fairly rare prize: people keep being appreciative of and impressed by my contributions, and it's nice to feel like a Valued Member of Society.)
((A little while ago I impressed *the Dean of Business* while chatting with her about US-expat-friendly investment strategies, which was quite the ego boost.))
[cw: heteronormativity, amnesia] [Dreamwidth; Wayback crawling forbidden] (OP by
hebethen) Horrified screaming regarding the view of sexuality a character in "The Lifecycle of Software Objects" espouses.
---
Links:
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
gdgdbaby) Secret Santa compliment meme! Here is my thread.
[Tumblr; Wayback] (by
bobacupcake; h/t
consumptive-sphinx) Art thieves vs Disney.
[Tumblr; Wayback] (by Carl Muckenhoupt; h/t
prokopetz) I'm told that this game is not for newcomers to the genre, so perhaps I will not actually play it, but there is just something so satisfying about reciting the blurb:
(As for the experience of attempting to *understand* it, it reminds me rather of reading French. "[???] the card on your head and walk [???] [???] the table. If it doesn't fall, [lose?] $1000."
(When we salvaged our bilingual version of that game, the English and French decks had gotten all jumbled together, and rather than sift them out we just went "what the hell, it'll be educational" and played with a shuffled English/French deck.))
Laugh rule:
[cw: unsanitary, violence] [Rock Paper Shotgun; Wayback] (by Nate Crowley)
( Read more... )
(I think I'm going to have to keep an eye on this guy.)
[cw: what it says on the tin (no pictures)] Recipe: Chocolate Nut Torte
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: venting] [Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[cw: amnesia, arguably unreality] (Note: the Tumblr reverse-post-order glitch continues.) [Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(I've decided that tag rambles are a substantial enough contribution to be worth including.) [Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
(Note: I do not actually *endorse* the claim that people imposing [selection pressure for accounting talent] on my *ancestors* are harming *me* (though I can see why someone might argue it, and certainly it was harming *them*). Personally I've been rather enjoying having won accounting in the lottery of fascinations, *especially* because it is--by the standards of the general population--a fairly rare prize: people keep being appreciative of and impressed by my contributions, and it's nice to feel like a Valued Member of Society.)
((A little while ago I impressed *the Dean of Business* while chatting with her about US-expat-friendly investment strategies, which was quite the ego boost.))
[cw: heteronormativity, amnesia] [Dreamwidth; Wayback crawling forbidden] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
---
Links:
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Tumblr; Wayback] (by
[Tumblr; Wayback] (by Carl Muckenhoupt; h/t
Finally, here you are. At the delcot of tondam, where doshes deave. But the doshery lutt is crenned with glauds.
Glauds! How rorm it would be to pell back to the bewl and distunk them, distunk the whole delcot, let the drokes uncren them.
But you are the gostak. The gostak distims the doshes. And no glaud will vorl them from you.
(As for the experience of attempting to *understand* it, it reminds me rather of reading French. "[???] the card on your head and walk [???] [???] the table. If it doesn't fall, [lose?] $1000."
(When we salvaged our bilingual version of that game, the English and French decks had gotten all jumbled together, and rather than sift them out we just went "what the hell, it'll be educational" and played with a shuffled English/French deck.))
Laugh rule:
[cw: unsanitary, violence] [Rock Paper Shotgun; Wayback] (by Nate Crowley)
( Read more... )
(I think I'm going to have to keep an eye on this guy.)
(no subject)
Nov. 28th, 2019 04:59 pm[Mathematical Association of America; Wayback] (by Paul Lockhart; h/t
nonanalogue)
I'm trying to figure out why this article bothers me, and then he keeps on putting words that are *almost* mine into the mouth of a punching bag and claiming to have debunked them, and I'm just left sputtering "but, but! lining things up into satisfying patterns! optimisation and making things *right*! the joy/flow of executing a procedure you are deeply familiar with and know will achieve your goal! the comfort of knowing that a method of achieving your goal exists even during times when you're struggling to reach it! that lovely feeling you get when you get a new math textbook and take a peek at the last chapter, and think 'within the next six months, I'm going to *understand* all of that jargon that flew over my head just now: I am going to take this new thing and grasp it, and I will be *more* than I am now'! *compound interest*, goddammit!!"
---
He seems to *really* not want to be rounded off to just an instance of the relatively common theory-of-mind failure "my vocation is the Objective Best vocation and y'all are missing out on (possibly maliciously deprived of) how fucking amazing it is", but I still wonder how much of what's going on here is that [the kind of math he's singing the praises of] is simply the kind *he* likes best.
I'm trying to figure out why this article bothers me, and then he keeps on putting words that are *almost* mine into the mouth of a punching bag and claiming to have debunked them, and I'm just left sputtering "but, but! lining things up into satisfying patterns! optimisation and making things *right*! the joy/flow of executing a procedure you are deeply familiar with and know will achieve your goal! the comfort of knowing that a method of achieving your goal exists even during times when you're struggling to reach it! that lovely feeling you get when you get a new math textbook and take a peek at the last chapter, and think 'within the next six months, I'm going to *understand* all of that jargon that flew over my head just now: I am going to take this new thing and grasp it, and I will be *more* than I am now'! *compound interest*, goddammit!!"
---
He seems to *really* not want to be rounded off to just an instance of the relatively common theory-of-mind failure "my vocation is the Objective Best vocation and y'all are missing out on (possibly maliciously deprived of) how fucking amazing it is", but I still wonder how much of what's going on here is that [the kind of math he's singing the praises of] is simply the kind *he* likes best.
Comment and Link Roundup: April 12, 2019
Apr. 12th, 2019 09:16 pmI think I will try making link roundups part of my backup routine, so every 1 - 2 weeks.
(Although after going through my recent comment logs, I've found that this roundup isn't as overwhelmingly large as I thought. It looks like my comments over the past few weeks were concentrated into a relatively small number of threads, so there aren't *all* that many different links.)
---
Comments on my own posts:
[cw: embarrassment squick] The one about Daylight Savings
[cw: death, aging] A thought experiment [four comments]
[arguably cw: amnesia] The tracker for ArchiveTeam's Google+ project is a sight to behold right now
On microtransactions [three comments]
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: poverty, arguably disordered eating, kind of discourse-y] [Tumblr part 1; Tumblr part 2; Wayback part 1; Wayback part 2] (OP by
shieldfoss; in response to
rustingbridges) Food budgets and travelling. [five comments]
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
eightiesbf; in response to
maryellencarter and
sigmaleph) Mental addition. [two comments]
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
yesterdaysprint; in response to
rustingbridges) Optimal bread buttering. (addendum here) [three comments]
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
sigmaleph) Why say "half-elf" when you can say "orf"?
---
Links:
Three laugh-rule entries:
[Bloomberg; Wayback crawling forbidden] (by Matt Levine)
[Slate Star Codex; Wayback] (by Scott Alexander)
[Blogspot; Wayback] (by Chris Witham)
(Although after going through my recent comment logs, I've found that this roundup isn't as overwhelmingly large as I thought. It looks like my comments over the past few weeks were concentrated into a relatively small number of threads, so there aren't *all* that many different links.)
---
Comments on my own posts:
[cw: embarrassment squick] The one about Daylight Savings
[cw: death, aging] A thought experiment [four comments]
[arguably cw: amnesia] The tracker for ArchiveTeam's Google+ project is a sight to behold right now
On microtransactions [three comments]
---
Comments on other people's posts:
[cw: poverty, arguably disordered eating, kind of discourse-y] [Tumblr part 1; Tumblr part 2; Wayback part 1; Wayback part 2] (OP by
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
[Tumblr; Wayback] (OP by
[Dreamwidth; Wayback] (OP by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
---
Links:
Three laugh-rule entries:
[Bloomberg; Wayback crawling forbidden] (by Matt Levine)
The business came of age in an era of excess, but where the culture of Wall Street was reputedly fuelled by drink and drugs, Gross insists he never saw anything troubling at Pimco. Their main high, he says, was sugar — especially M&M’s. “It gave us all the false courage in the world to take on dealers and tell them to go f*** themselves,” Gross recalls wistfully, as he tucks into what looks like an unremarkable tuna melt.
He … what? Their secret weapon was M&M’s? I’m trying to imagine Gross, high as a kite on red M&Ms, calling his coked-up Salomon Bros. salesman and screaming at him over a basis point. Gross, seeing a young protege looking stressed and bleary-eyed midway through a difficult Fed Day, tossing him a bag of candy and saying confidentially “here kid, try some M, only way to survive in this business.” Gross and his crew of traders, celebrating a big year with an all-night party in Vegas featuring fountains of M&Ms. I hope someone does make a movie of his life, just for the M&M scenes.
[Slate Star Codex; Wayback] (by Scott Alexander)
If this doesn’t make a lot of sense to you, you should read this tutorial, in order to recalibrate your ideas of how little sense things can make.
[Blogspot; Wayback] (by Chris Witham)
but truly everything about how she was holding herself suddenly screamed, Bashful!
Or, at the very least, Sunset's posture meekly opened the door, cautiously stuck its head into the room while hiding most of its form behind the door frame, whispered:
Um... I'm bashful, if anyone . . . you know, is interested in that information
paused a moment, added:
Sorry for bothering you
shrunk back a bit at any attention, real or imagined, it had gathered, quickly finished with:
Bye-now
and sprinted away as fast as its figurative legs would take it.
Because posture like that doesn't really scream anything.
is the way it gives exactly zero fucks about mixed units. As an MSL (metric as a second language) bilingual, it's so nice to be able to just code-switch at it.
Me: "Hey, if gasoline costs 95.3 cents per litre and my car gets 22 miles per gallon, how much does it cost to drive 42 kilometres?"
WolframAlpha, not batting an eye: "$4.28."
Me: "Thank you!"
---
Anyone else have any favourite things about WolframAlpha they want to talk about? I haven't used it for all that many different things, so there's probably lots of great bits I haven't discovered or appreciated.
Me: "Hey, if gasoline costs 95.3 cents per litre and my car gets 22 miles per gallon, how much does it cost to drive 42 kilometres?"
WolframAlpha, not batting an eye: "$4.28."
Me: "Thank you!"
---
Anyone else have any favourite things about WolframAlpha they want to talk about? I haven't used it for all that many different things, so there's probably lots of great bits I haven't discovered or appreciated.