brin_bellway: forget-me-not flowers (Default)
Brin ([personal profile] brin_bellway) wrote2019-11-28 04:59 pm

(no subject)

[Mathematical Association of America; Wayback] (by Paul Lockhart; h/t [tumblr.com profile] nonanalogue)

I'm trying to figure out why this article bothers me, and then he keeps on putting words that are *almost* mine into the mouth of a punching bag and claiming to have debunked them, and I'm just left sputtering "but, but! lining things up into satisfying patterns! optimisation and making things *right*! the joy/flow of executing a procedure you are deeply familiar with and know will achieve your goal! the comfort of knowing that a method of achieving your goal exists even during times when you're struggling to reach it! that lovely feeling you get when you get a new math textbook and take a peek at the last chapter, and think 'within the next six months, I'm going to *understand* all of that jargon that flew over my head just now: I am going to take this new thing and grasp it, and I will be *more* than I am now'! *compound interest*, goddammit!!"

---

He seems to *really* not want to be rounded off to just an instance of the relatively common theory-of-mind failure "my vocation is the Objective Best vocation and y'all are missing out on (possibly maliciously deprived of) how fucking amazing it is", but I still wonder how much of what's going on here is that [the kind of math he's singing the praises of] is simply the kind *he* likes best.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org