Brin (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
brin_bellway) wrote2021-10-07 02:10 pm
brin_bellway) wrote2021-10-07 02:10 pm
(no subject)
[arguably cw: ableism]
When I first saw the term "hyperfixation" in use it seemed to refer specifically to something short-term, that thing ADHD people are particularly prone to where one gets absorbed in doing something and one looks up and it's six hours later and one hasn't eaten. But lately I've been seeing people use it in a way that sounds more like perseveration/special-interest, a longer-term "like falling in love with something that isn't a person" thing.
Is the term "special interest" going the way of "perseveration" before it? I understood that switch because the meaning of "special interest" is more intuitive, but why the move to "hyperfixation"? It sounds more pathologising, for one thing (with that "hyper-" prefix), and I'm sure that *could* be reclaimed and probably already has been in some circles, but I'm confused as to why one would use a new term that's more of a fixer-upper than the previous term.
Do...do The Youth not *know* the term "special interest", and had to expand the meaning of "hyperfixation" to cover it because they *had* no word for it otherwise? Is...is that what happened last time too, did The Youth of the 2010's not *know* that people in the 00's called it "perseveration"?
I-- I don't know, it's hard to get a good perspective on these kinds of things, to know the difference between cultural shifts that are actually happening and shifts that are artifacts of whom I happen to be hanging out with. Reading a retrospective on the rise and fall of New Atheism was a strange experience: I'd assumed they were still out there, and that it was just that I personally wasn't reading the right blogs to encounter them anymore.
Likewise, I saw a Tumblr post a while back saying that the asexual community had been stifled so much by constant external flamewars that it had disrupted the flow of culture and mentorship between generations, and that newly coming-of-age aces knew nothing about asexual culture of a decade before. That, too, I'd assumed was an artifact of my personal experience: I still consider myself at least *approximately* ace, but it's not a big part of my identity and I've drifted away from asexual spaces. For that matter, it still *could* be an artifact of personal experience: for all I know, the Tumblrite may have been reading too much into their own view of the elephant.
I'm not against slang, but the words for a non-ephemeral concept should not be *exclusively* ephemeral. We shouldn't have to invent new terms for a *fundamental aspect of our mental landscapes* every few years because each new generation was left to figure it out by themselves.
Today's 13-year-olds deserve what I had when I was 13.
When I first saw the term "hyperfixation" in use it seemed to refer specifically to something short-term, that thing ADHD people are particularly prone to where one gets absorbed in doing something and one looks up and it's six hours later and one hasn't eaten. But lately I've been seeing people use it in a way that sounds more like perseveration/special-interest, a longer-term "like falling in love with something that isn't a person" thing.
Is the term "special interest" going the way of "perseveration" before it? I understood that switch because the meaning of "special interest" is more intuitive, but why the move to "hyperfixation"? It sounds more pathologising, for one thing (with that "hyper-" prefix), and I'm sure that *could* be reclaimed and probably already has been in some circles, but I'm confused as to why one would use a new term that's more of a fixer-upper than the previous term.
Do...do The Youth not *know* the term "special interest", and had to expand the meaning of "hyperfixation" to cover it because they *had* no word for it otherwise? Is...is that what happened last time too, did The Youth of the 2010's not *know* that people in the 00's called it "perseveration"?
I-- I don't know, it's hard to get a good perspective on these kinds of things, to know the difference between cultural shifts that are actually happening and shifts that are artifacts of whom I happen to be hanging out with. Reading a retrospective on the rise and fall of New Atheism was a strange experience: I'd assumed they were still out there, and that it was just that I personally wasn't reading the right blogs to encounter them anymore.
Likewise, I saw a Tumblr post a while back saying that the asexual community had been stifled so much by constant external flamewars that it had disrupted the flow of culture and mentorship between generations, and that newly coming-of-age aces knew nothing about asexual culture of a decade before. That, too, I'd assumed was an artifact of my personal experience: I still consider myself at least *approximately* ace, but it's not a big part of my identity and I've drifted away from asexual spaces. For that matter, it still *could* be an artifact of personal experience: for all I know, the Tumblrite may have been reading too much into their own view of the elephant.
I'm not against slang, but the words for a non-ephemeral concept should not be *exclusively* ephemeral. We shouldn't have to invent new terms for a *fundamental aspect of our mental landscapes* every few years because each new generation was left to figure it out by themselves.
Today's 13-year-olds deserve what I had when I was 13.